ProxyRack
Unmetered residential plans billed by threads
$49/mo
from $49/mo /GB
- IP Pool
- 2M+
- Countries
- 140+
- Uptime
- 99.4%
- Avg. response
- 1.3s
- Free trial
- Yes
- Founded
- 2012
Our verdict
ProxyRack's thread-based unmetered model is a genuinely useful alternative: if your workload is bandwidth-heavy but concurrency-light, it beats per-GB billing handily and removes the meter-watching stress.
The network itself is mid-tier — a 2M+ pool with country-level targeting that handles everyday targets but yields to premium pools on hard ones.
Pick it for the billing model when it matches your workload shape; pick something else for peak success rates or fine geo-targeting.
Speed test & performance
- Residential IPs
- 2M+
- Billing
- Threads
- Protocols
- HTTP & SOCKS5
- Founded
- 2012
140+ countries
Unmetered bandwidth
All products
Australia
Pros & cons
Pros
- Unmetered bandwidth on residential plans
- Thread-based billing suits heavy-bandwidth jobs
- HTTP(S) and SOCKS5 support
- 140+ country targeting
- Long track record
Cons
- Mid-tier pool quality
- No city targeting
- Expensive at very high concurrency
Overview
ProxyRack, founded in 2012 in Australia, takes a different angle on residential pricing: plans are unmetered on bandwidth and billed by concurrent connections (threads) instead, alongside budget datacenter and mixed rotating products.
Network and coverage
The network advertises 2M+ residential IPs (unmetered plans) plus large mixed/datacenter pools, with country targeting across 140+ countries, HTTP(S) and SOCKS5, and rotating or sticky sessions. Because you pay for threads, heavy-bandwidth jobs at moderate concurrency can be very economical.
Who it is for
Scrapers with high bandwidth but controllable concurrency — think large page bodies, media, or long crawls — and anyone who hates per-GB anxiety. The thread model rewards exactly what per-GB billing punishes.
Trade-offs
The pool is mid-sized and quality is mid-tier: fine on tolerant targets, weaker on protected ones. City targeting is absent, and the thread model becomes expensive if you need massive concurrency with light bandwidth.
Features & capabilities
Unmetered residential plans
No bandwidth caps — billing by concurrent threads.
Rotating & sticky sessions
Per-request rotation or held sessions.
Country targeting
140+ countries.
Budget datacenter pools
Cheap mixed and DC options for tolerant targets.
City-level targeting
Country granularity only.
Scraping API / unblocker
Raw proxy access only.
Integrations & supported tools
Privacy & compliance
Frequently asked questions
Residential plans are unmetered on bandwidth and priced by concurrent connections (threads). You choose a plan sized to how many simultaneous connections you run, and pull as much data as you like within it.
When you move a lot of data through relatively few simultaneous connections — large pages, media files, long crawls. Per-GB providers punish exactly that pattern.
Around 2M+ residential IPs on the unmetered plans plus larger mixed and datacenter pools, covering 140+ countries with country-level targeting.
Yes, both HTTP(S) and SOCKS5 are supported across the product range.
It is a mid-tier pool: dependable on everyday sites, but heavily defended targets convert better on premium networks like Bright Data or Oxylabs.
User reviews (0)
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.