New videos every week — proxies, VPNs & antidetect browsers, explained.

Subscribe

Your privacy is exposed — websites can see your IP, location and device.

Try Surfshark urgently →
P

PIA S5 Proxy

Massive per-IP SOCKS5 residential marketplace

3.4(0)3.4 out of 5 from 0 reviews
Founded 2022
6.8

$0.04/IP

from $0.04/IP /GB

IP Pool
350M+ (claimed)
Countries
200+
Uptime
99.0%
Avg. response
1.7s
Free trial
No
Founded
2022

Our verdict

PIA S5 Proxy offers the most granular identity-shopping experience in the budget market: filter to a city or zip code, inspect the IP, bind it, and pay cents. For low-stakes multi-accounting, that control is genuinely useful.

The elephant in the room is provenance. Sourcing is opaque in a product category with a troubled history, IP lifespans are unpredictable, and the desktop-client model fights automation.

Useful with eyes open and stakes low; not a tool for compliance-sensitive or high-value work.

Speed test & performance

Advertised inventory
350M+ (claimed)

Historical, not concurrent

Model
Per-IP S5

Plus traffic plans

Filtering
City / ISP / zip

Hand-pick identities

Cost
Cents per IP

Bulk packages

Pros & cons

Pros

  • Per-IP purchase with granular filtering (city, ISP, zip)
  • Enormous advertised IP inventory
  • Very low per-IP cost
  • Desktop client for browsing identities
  • Traffic plans available alongside per-IP

Cons

  • Minimal sourcing transparency
  • IP quality and lifespan vary widely
  • Desktop-client workflow hinders automation
  • Unsuitable for compliance-sensitive use

Overview

PIA S5 Proxy (unrelated to the Private Internet Access VPN) is a per-IP SOCKS5 residential marketplace advertising one of the largest pools in the industry. Instead of buying bandwidth, you buy individual residential SOCKS5 IPs — a model popular in multi-accounting communities.

Network and coverage

The marketplace advertises 350M+ historical residential IPs across 200 locations, browsable and filterable by country, state, city, ISP, and even zip code through a desktop client. Billing is per IP or via traffic-based residential plans added more recently.

Who it is for

Multi-accounters and users who want to hand-pick identities: browse available IPs in a location, check their attributes, and pay only for the ones you bind. The granularity is unmatched at the price.

Trade-offs

Sourcing transparency is minimal — a serious consideration given the model's heritage (the niche was created by the FBI-seized 911 S5). IP quality and longevity vary widely, the desktop-client workflow is clunky for automation, and compliance-sensitive teams should steer clear.

Features & capabilities

Granular IP filtering

Filter available IPs by city, ISP, even zip code.

Pay-per-IP binding

Buy exactly the identities you need for cents each.

Desktop client

Browse, test, and bind IPs interactively.

Traffic-based plans

Conventional per-GB residential also available.

Automation-friendly API

The desktop-centric model fights headless workflows.

Documented sourcing

Provenance is opaque — the model's core risk.

Integrations & supported tools

BitBrowser· Anti-detectAdsPower· Anti-detectWindows client· DesktopSOCKS5 clients· Protocol

Privacy & compliance

Ethically sourced IPs
GDPR compliant
Crypto payment accepted
KYC for sensitive use
Public sourcing documentation

Frequently asked questions

No. Despite the name, it is an unrelated SOCKS5 residential proxy marketplace. The shared initials are a frequent source of confusion.

You browse available residential IPs in the desktop client, filter by country, state, city, ISP, or zip code, and pay a small fee per IP you bind. You use the IP until it goes offline.

Sourcing is not meaningfully documented. In a category whose largest predecessor (911 S5) was seized as a botnet, that opacity is the key risk to weigh before using the service.

Unpredictably — some stay online for days, others drop within hours. Budget accordingly and avoid binding anything critical to a single purchased IP.

Not really; the per-IP desktop model suits manual multi-accounting more than automated scraping. Its newer traffic-based plans exist, but conventional providers integrate far more cleanly.

User reviews (0)

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.