LunaProxy
Huge advertised pool at rock-bottom prices
$0.85/GB
from $0.85/GB /GB
- IP Pool
- 200M+ (claimed)
- Countries
- 195+
- Uptime
- 99.2%
- Avg. response
- 1.5s
- Free trial
- No
- Founded
- 2022
Our verdict
LunaProxy is aggressive on price in a way Western competitors rarely match, and for tolerant, high-volume targets the economics can genuinely work — especially on unlimited plans.
The caveats are real: headline pool numbers do not reflect concurrently available IPs, quality varies session to session, sourcing transparency is limited, and support is inconsistent in English.
Treat it as a budget workhorse for low-stakes volume, test against your targets before committing, and keep a premium provider in reserve for anything hard or sensitive.
Speed test & performance
- Advertised pool
- 200M+ (claimed)
- Starting price
- <$1/GB promo
- Coverage
- 195+ countries
- Plan models
- Traffic / Unlimited / Per-IP
Usable subset far smaller
Among market's lowest
State & city targeting
Unusual flexibility
Pros & cons
Pros
- Among the lowest prices in the market
- Traffic, unlimited, and per-IP plan models
- Country, state, and city targeting
- HTTP(S) and SOCKS5 support
- Full product spread: residential, ISP, DC, mobile
Cons
- Advertised pool size far exceeds usable IPs
- Inconsistent IP quality and success rates
- Limited sourcing transparency
- English support and docs are weak
Overview
LunaProxy is a Hong Kong-based budget provider founded in 2022 that competes almost purely on numbers: an advertised pool in the hundreds of millions of IPs and promotional residential pricing under $1 per GB that undercuts nearly everyone.
Network and coverage
Products span rotating residential, static residential (ISP), datacenter, and mobile, with country/state/city targeting in 195+ locations and both HTTP(S) and SOCKS5. Plans include traffic-based, unlimited, and per-IP models, giving unusual pricing flexibility at the bottom of the market.
Who it is for
Price-first buyers running tolerant targets at volume: bulk data collection, SERP sampling, availability checks. The unlimited plans in particular can be cost-effective for high-throughput jobs where per-GB billing stings.
Trade-offs
Advertised pool figures should be taken with skepticism (concurrent availability is far lower), IP quality and success rates are inconsistent, sourcing transparency is limited, English-language support is hit-and-miss, and documentation is thin. It is a price play, with the compromises that implies.
Features & capabilities
Rock-bottom pricing
Promotional rates under $1/GB and unlimited plans.
State & city targeting
Geo-targeting across 195+ locations.
Unlimited-traffic plans
Flat-rate options for high-throughput jobs.
Static residential (ISP)
Per-IP static options available.
Consistent premium-grade success rates
Quality varies; hard targets favour premium pools.
Transparent IP sourcing
Limited public documentation of supply.
Integrations & supported tools
Privacy & compliance
Frequently asked questions
The headline figure counts historical IPs, not what is concurrently online. Like most budget mega-pool claims, expect the usable pool at any moment to be a small fraction of the advertised number.
Promotional residential rates dip under $1/GB, with unlimited and per-IP plans that can work out cheaper still for high-volume use. It is consistently among the lowest-priced options in the category.
Not reliably. IP quality is inconsistent, and heavily defended targets will produce more blocks than premium pools. It is best suited to tolerant, high-volume targets.
Yes, SOCKS5 and HTTP(S) are both supported across the main products, so it integrates with standard scrapers and anti-detect browsers.
Run a small paid test against your actual targets, verify geo-targeting accuracy for the locations you need, and confirm the plan model (traffic vs unlimited vs per-IP) that fits your usage pattern.
User reviews (0)
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.