IPIDEA
Large-pool budget proxies with enterprise ambitions
$1.80/GB
from $1.80/GB /GB
- IP Pool
- 90M+ (claimed)
- Countries
- 190+
- Uptime
- 99.3%
- Avg. response
- 1.4s
- Free trial
- No
- Founded
- 2019
Our verdict
IPIDEA offers more structure than the cheapest S5 vendors — proper traffic plans, API access, static products — at prices that still undercut Western rivals meaningfully.
Execution is uneven: session quality and geo-accuracy fluctuate, sourcing is opaque, and documentation translates poorly in places.
A reasonable budget-volume option, particularly for APAC-based teams; less compelling if you need predictable quality or Western-hours support.
Speed test & performance
- Advertised pool
- 90M+ (claimed)
- Starting price
- ~$1.80/GB
- Access
- Gateway & API
- Protocols
- HTTP & SOCKS5
190+ locations
Volume discounts
Endpoint generation
All products
Pros & cons
Pros
- Large pool at budget prices
- Traffic, static ISP, and datacenter products
- API access and gateway endpoints
- Country, state, and city targeting
- Strong APAC support coverage
Cons
- Inconsistent session quality and geo-accuracy
- Opaque sourcing
- Uneven English documentation
- Enterprise packaging exceeds polish
Overview
IPIDEA is one of the larger Chinese proxy vendors, marketing a 90M+ residential pool with enterprise-flavoured packaging: traffic plans, static ISP, datacenter, and API access, at prices between the rock-bottom S5 vendors and Western mid-market providers.
Network and coverage
Coverage spans 190+ locations with country/state/city targeting over HTTP(S) and SOCKS5, rotating and sticky sessions, and endpoint-gateway or API-driven access. Static residential and datacenter products complement the core rotating pool.
Who it is for
Volume data collection on tolerant-to-moderate targets where per-GB cost dominates the decision, and teams in APAC time zones where its support coverage is strongest.
Trade-offs
Western buyers report inconsistent session quality and geo-accuracy, sourcing documentation is limited, and the dashboard/docs translate unevenly. The enterprise packaging is ahead of the enterprise polish.
Features & capabilities
Budget volume pricing
Undercuts Western mid-market meaningfully.
API-driven provisioning
Generate endpoints programmatically.
Static residential (ISP)
Per-IP static options available.
City-level targeting
Country, state, and city selection.
Consistent geo-accuracy
Location accuracy fluctuates.
Western-hours support
Support coverage is strongest in APAC.
Integrations & supported tools
Privacy & compliance
Frequently asked questions
It advertises 90M+ residential IPs across 190+ locations. As with all such claims, the concurrently online pool is much smaller — test coverage in your target geos before committing.
Cheaper per GB, broader advertised coverage, but less consistent quality, thinner documentation, and support that is strongest in APAC hours. The trade is cost versus predictability.
Yes — proxies can be consumed via gateway endpoints or generated through an API, alongside dashboard-based management.
Static residential options exist, but limited sourcing transparency makes it a riskier home for valuable accounts than quality-focused providers.
Geo-targeting accuracy in your required countries, sticky session stability over your needed durations, and success rates on your actual targets — quality varies more here than at premium providers.
User reviews (0)
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.